Building and Reconstruction → Authors Guidelines

Building and Reconstruction


Authors Guidelines

Home

Editorial Board

Publication Ethics

All issues

Authors Guidelines

Reviewers Guidelines

Submit Your Paper

Abstracting & Indexing

Contacts:

302030, Russia, Orel,

Moskovskaya street, 77, cab. 214

Ph.: +7(4862)73-43-49

E-mail: editiorial@brjournal.ru

Authors Guidelines

 

Article Title

 

The article title is a definition of the research object. In exceptional cases, an indication of the research method can be added to the definition.

Please, do not include in the title:

  • words that indicate the research process (eg, analysis, research, study, application, search, definition, decision, calculation);
  • words that indicate the relevance (new, modern, current);
  • words indicating superiority (best, most / least profitable, optimal, most);
  • general introductory constructions and words (to the question of, in terms of some features, issues, problems).

The title of the article excludes the use of verbs. The recommended length of the title is 7 words (not including prepositions and conjunctions).

 

Abstract

 

The article abstract performs an important representative function in all information bases and is an independent source of information. The abstract purpose is to give the reader an idea of the article content without reading the full text.

Abstracts should be:

  • uncluttered (do not contain excessive parenthesis);
  • informative (to reflect the main content of the article and the results of research);
  • structured (follow the structure of the article).

The text of the abstract should be brief and clear, free of background information, superfluous introductory words, general and insignificant formulations.

The abstract should have the same structure as the text of the article and contain 1-2 sentences for each clause:

  • description of the research object;
  • formulation of motivation;
  • research method (briefly);
  • results of the study (it is recommended to indicate the specific results and dependencies obtained in the study);
  • conclusions (briefly).

The text must be coherent; the statements should be logical from one another.

In abstract is not recommended to:

  • use complex grammatical constructions;
  • use non-standard or uncommon abbreviations (if essential, abbreviations must be defined at their first mention in the abstract itself);
  • use links to sources;
  • use formulas and illustrations;
  • leave out the research results in order to intrigue the reader.

Content and structure of the article

The journal "Building and Reconstruction" publishes original, previously unpublished articles containing new scientific results obtained by the authors, representing international interest.

 

Topics covered by the journal:

  • Строительные конструкции, здания и сооружения;
  • Основания и фундаменты, подземные сооружения;
  • Теплоснабжение, вентиляция, кондиционирование воздуха, газоснабжение и освещение;
  • Строительные материалы и изделия;
  • Технология и организация строительства;
  • Строительная механика;
  • Экологическая безопасность строительства и городского хозяйства;
  • Архитектура зданий и сооружений. Творческие концепции архитектурной деятельности;
  • Градостроительство, планировка сельских населенных пунктов.

Following paragraphs are required for the original research article according to the international standard IMRAD:

  1. Introduction begins with the description of the research object. Then formulates the study relevance and background based on the literature review. Recommendations on the literature list copilation you can find here. The section presents the formulation of the research goal, which contains a list of tasks to be solved, as a conclusion from the literature review.
  2. Methods describes in detail the selected research method. The method should be defined in such a way that another researcher could reproduce it and get similar results.
  3. Results and Discussion should preferably be presented in the form of tables, graphs and other figures. This section includes the results themselves and their analysis, their interpretation, comparison with the results of other authors.
  4. Conclusions summarizes the results of scientific research. The section contains a numbered list briefly summarizing the main scientific results of the article. Conclusions should be logically in accordance with the tasks at the beginning of the article.
  5. Acknowledgement. This section is optional, it expresses gratitude for the financial, information and other support provided during the writing of the article.

Formating guidelines for the article are listed here.

 

References:

A representative list of literature characterizes the relevance and qualitative level of research conducted by the author. These recommendations are compiled in accordance with global trends and contribute to greater openness of scientific publications as well as improve the performance of articles and their authors in databases.

Recommendations on completeness and representativeness:

  1. Volume.  It is recommended to include in the list of references scientific articles, monographs, conference proceedings, electronic resources with a date of reference. The recommended volume of the literature list is 20-40 citings, not including hard-to-access and normative sources as well as links to Internet web-sites, which are not periodicals. As hard-to-access sources we understand organization reports, albums of standard solutions and other similar sources, which can not be found in the catalogs of the leading Russian and international depository libraries. Normative sources are laws and other regulation documents (e.g. Eurocodes, ISO, ASTM, etc.) As Internet not periodical sources we understand web-sites on the Internet that publish information without scientific peer review. Hard-to-access and normative sources are recommended to be mentioned in the text of the article. It is strongly recommended not to include textbooks, teaching aids, lecture notes and other educational literature in the article.
  2. Relevance. For a representative review of the literature it is necessary that the sources were relevant. We recommend to have in the list of literature at least 10 publications published over the last 10 years, 5 of them - not older than 3 years.
  3. Geography. According to the requirements of the journal, the literature review should confirm the lack of a solution to the stated goal in the world literature, and therefore recommend that you have in the list of literature not only your country but also foreign publications. The recommended volume is not less than half of the total number of sources in the literature list. Foreign sources are publications published in a foreign journal (not your country). The language of publication in this case is irrelevant.
  4. Level of publications. It is recommended that at least 6 of foreign and at least 6 of your country sources are included in one of the leading citation indexes: 
  1. Self-citation. Within the limits of self-citation, it is not recommended to have more than 5 sources, the authors or co-authors of which are the authors of the article.

Requirements for the list formating

Correctly written description of the source is a guarantee that the cited publication will be taken into account when assessing the author's scientific activity and, as a consequence, the organization.

The quoted literature is given in the general list at the end of the article in the order of mentioning in the text. The ordinal number in the text is enclosed in square brackets (e.g. [9], [11, 12], [16-20]). The article should contain references to all sources from the list of references.

We kindly ask you, when referring to a source, use its official metadata in both Cyrilic and Latin as indicated in the source. It is highly appreciated to use DOI, if it is available.

Examples:

  • book

Guzonas D., Novotny R., Penttilä S. Structural Materials for Generation IV Nuclear Reactors. Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing. 2017. 684 p. doi.org/10.1016/C2014-0-03589-7.

  • journal article

Kolchunov V.I., Savin S.Y. Dynamic effects in a composite two-component rods which appear when local fracture of the matrix is occurred. Journal of Applied Engineering Science. 2017. Vol. 15. No. 3. Pp: 325-331. doi:10.5937/jaes15-14602.

  • proceedings of conference

Calvo G.J.L. Performance of concrete in precast products due to heat curing. Proceedings of XIII International Congress on the chemistry of cement. Madrid, 2011. 183 p.

  • electronic resource

Simões, I., Simões, N., Tadeu, A. Laboratory assessment of thermal transmittance of homogeneous building elements using infrared thermography. [Online]. System requirements: AdobeAcrobatReader. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21611/qirt.2014.081 (date of application: 03.10.2016).

Formatting guidelines

The articles are submitted in the .docx format (MS Word 2007-2016). The article file submitted via E-submission System should contain only the text itself without a title, abstract, list of literature, names and data of the authors. All these fields are filled out separately during the article submission via e-system.

Recommended volume of articles: from 10,000 to 30,000 characters with spaces.

Page setup: top 2 cm, bottom 2.5 cm, left 2 cm, right 2 cm. Font - Times New Roman. The font size of the main text is 12, additional (tables, footnotes, notes) - 10, line spacing - single. Paragraphs break – 1,25 cm.

The text is typed in accordance with the following rules:

  • orientation of all pages - book;
  • all words within a paragraph are separated by only one space;
  • before the punctuation mark there is no space, after it - one space;
  • tabulations, tears, inscriptions are not allowed.

All abbreviations used by the author, with the exception of the generally accepted ones, should be determined when they are first mentioned in the text.

Formulas are typed using the functions of MS Word (inside the text). Formula parameters:

  • font - Times New Roman;
  • sizes: usual - 12 pt, large index - 9 pt, small index - 7 pt, large character - 18 pt, small character - 10 pt;
  • outline: variable and lowercase Greek - italic, the rest - straight lines.

Numbered and bulleted lists should be executed using the appropriate MS Word tools, not manually. The names of sections must be made in the style of "Heading". Tables are made by tools of Word (not drawings) and are located inside the text of the article. Illustrations can be presented in separate graphic files in the field "Archive of accompanying materials" in E-submission System for saving image quality (one picture - one file). Available formats: JPEG, TIFF, BMP. In the text document the illustrations should be inserted to indicate the recommended location for their use.

Anonymity of authors

When working on the article, we ask you to follow these rules to preserve your anonymity:

  • do not specify the names of authors in the title of documents;
  • do not specify the authors' names in the text of the article;
  • do not use the authors' names in the "Discussion" field of E-submission form.

 

Submission of the article

Submission of all materials is carried out electronically through E-submission System, in which the author must register. After registration in the electronic editorial system the personal profile of the author is automatically generated. There you need to upload the article in the "My articles" menu. All interaction with the editor and reviewers is via E-submission System in the "Discussion" field.

Order of consideration

  1. After the article submission to the electronic editorial system it is checked by the editor for compliance with the journal requirements. In case of their violation the article might be sent to the author for revision or rejected. The reason for rejection can be disconformity to the main requirements, the subject of the journal, the discovery of the fact of plagiarism or re-publication. In this case, the author is necessarily provided with a reasoned refusal in the "Discussion" field on the article page.
  2. If the article meets all requirements, the editor will appoint 2 or more scientific reviewers. Reviewing in the journal is "double-blind", i.e. neither the reviewer, nor the author of the article, does not aware of each other's identities.
  3. The editorial staff provides reviewing of all scientific articles accepted to consideration. Peer review is carried out by invited reviewers.
  4. If you receive a negative review of the article from two reviewers, it will not be considered further.
  5. In the case of receiving only one negative review, the editor appoints an additional reviewer.
  6. Based on the results of the review the edorial board assigns the article to the current issue, then the editor notify the author of the publication volume, DOI and timing.
  7. The time for article consideration may be extended in case of a submission of significant number of articles.

Accompanying documents

In addition to the article, the author must submit a signed license agreement. The document can be provided after the article is accepted for publication.

Fee for publication

There is no fee for submission, consideration, peer review or publication process.

 

Peer review

The editorial staff provides reviewing of all scientific articles accepted to consideration. Peer review is carried out by invited reviewers. The whole process of peer review proceeds through the E-submission system. Reviewing in the journal is "double-blind", i.e. neither the reviewer, nor the author of the article, does not aware of each other's identities.

Terms and procedure of peer review

The standard period for the preparation of one review is 2 weeks. Please, remember that the work of reviewers is carried out on a voluntary basis, therefore the review period depends on their availability and may be increased.

Based on the review, the reviewer chooses one of the possible conclusions:

  • accept;
  • accept with minor revision - after the author improvements, the article is reviewed by the editor;
  • send for major revision - after the author completes the article, it is sent for re-review
  • reject.

The opinion of the reviewer is a recommendation for the editor. The final decision on the article is made by the editorial board.

When sending an article after revision, the author should either correct the suggested by reviewer moments or explain the inability to do so. For discussion with reviewer and editor use the field "Discussion" on the article page. The standard deadline for the revision of the article is 2 weeks. If you need more time for correction, please, inform the editorial staff on the article page.

 

Template of article formatting

Download template

 


Русский | English
Login

To participate in the conference please login or register.